Peter Sankoff Navigation
  • Home
  • About
    • My profile
    • Research and writing
    • Awards and nominations
    • Published books
      • Animal Law in Australasia: A New Dialogue
      • Animal Law in Australasia: Continuing the Dialogue
      • Canadian Perspectives on Animals & the Law
      • Criminal Law: Manning, Mewett & Sankoff
      • Evidence Act Revisited for Criminal Lawyers
      • The Canadian Encyclopedic Digest
      • The Portable Guide to Witnesses
      • Witnesses
      • The Law of Witnesses and Evidence in Canada
  • Podcasts
  • Teaching videos
  • Legal work
  • Seminars
  • Shop
    • Shop
    • My account / Login
    • Cart
    • Checkout
    • Exclusive APH only
  •  
  • Home
  • About
    • My profile
    • Research and writing
    • Awards and nominations
    • Published books
      • Animal Law in Australasia: A New Dialogue
      • Animal Law in Australasia: Continuing the Dialogue
      • Canadian Perspectives on Animals & the Law
      • Criminal Law: Manning, Mewett & Sankoff
      • Evidence Act Revisited for Criminal Lawyers
      • The Canadian Encyclopedic Digest
      • The Portable Guide to Witnesses
      • Witnesses
      • The Law of Witnesses and Evidence in Canada
  • Podcasts
  • Teaching videos
  • Legal work
  • Seminars
  • Shop
    • Shop
    • My account / Login
    • Cart
    • Checkout
    • Exclusive APH only
  •  
Third Parties & Legal Advice Privilege | Peter Sankoff

Third Parties & Legal Advice Privilege

In Evidence Law, Privilege, Privileges and Immunities, Teaching Capsules by Peter Sankoff22/08/2017

In this video blog, I consider a thorny problem: when are communications that go from a client/lawyer through a third party and then to a lawyer/client protected by privilege. This complex issue was recently considered by the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal in Redhead Equipment Ltd. v. Canada, 2016 SKCA 115.

Peter Sankoff © 2021              Created by Social Media Revolution Design

  • Terms of use
  • Privacy policy
  • About me
  • Contact