View Post

The Richard Suter Case: Should You Refuse a Lawful Breath Sample Demand? (15mins)

In Case Comments, Case Comments, Criminal Law, Sentencing, Specific Offences by Peter SankoffLeave a Comment

The Richard Suter case has been the subject of big news in Edmonton. Suter caused a terrible tragedy when he drove his Jeep through the window of a restaurant patio, killing a 2.5 year old boy. Suter was recently sentenced to the “light” sentence of four months in prison for unlawfully failing to provide a breath sample when he knew that …

If you enjoyed this post, do me a favour and share!Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter
Share on Facebook
Facebook
Share on Google+
Google+
Share on LinkedIn
Linkedin
Share on Tumblr
Tumblr
Email this to someone
email
View Post

The James Forcillo Trial (20mins)

In Case Comments, Case Comments, Criminal Law, Defences, Homicide by Peter SankoffLeave a Comment

This VLog examines the Forcillo trial, where a Toronto police officer is charged with murder after shooting the victim on a Toronto street car. I examine the nature of the offence, and how it is driven by the definition of murder – even though this case differs a great deal from the “ordinary” murder case.  In particular, I consider whether …

If you enjoyed this post, do me a favour and share!Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter
Share on Facebook
Facebook
Share on Google+
Google+
Share on LinkedIn
Linkedin
Share on Tumblr
Tumblr
Email this to someone
email
View Post

Duffy, Wright and the Parliament of Canada Act (10mins)

In Case Comments, Case Comments, Criminal Law, Other Offences, Procedural Issues by Peter SankoffLeave a Comment

As the Mike Duffy trial continues, there is continued speculation that the RCMP bungled matters by not charging Duffy or Nigel Wright under section 16 of the Parliament of Canada Act, which prohibits a Senator from receiving (and a person from giving) “any compensation, directly or indirectly, for services rendered or to be rendered to any person, either by the …

If you enjoyed this post, do me a favour and share!Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter
Share on Facebook
Facebook
Share on Google+
Google+
Share on LinkedIn
Linkedin
Share on Tumblr
Tumblr
Email this to someone
email
View Post

West Jet Bomb Threats: Assessing Criminal Liability (15mins)

In Case Comments, Case Comments, Criminal Law, Specific Offences by Peter SankoffLeave a Comment

In this video blog, I consider the recent bomb threats made to WestJet, and assess what types of charges an offender might face. In particular, I assess whether these types of acts constitute acts of terrorism in and of themselves. If you enjoyed this post, do me a favour and share!TwitterFacebookGoogle+LinkedinTumblremail

If you enjoyed this post, do me a favour and share!Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter
Share on Facebook
Facebook
Share on Google+
Google+
Share on LinkedIn
Linkedin
Share on Tumblr
Tumblr
Email this to someone
email
View Post

R vs Barabash, Child Pornography and the Private Use Exception (10mins)

In Case Comments, Case Comments, Criminal Law, Specific Offences by Peter Sankoff2 Comments

In this video blog, I consider the Supreme Court of Canada’s recent decision in R v Barabash, 2015 SCC 29. In addition to explaining the decision, I consider some of its ramifications for the possession of child pornography. If you enjoyed this post, do me a favour and share!TwitterFacebookGoogle+LinkedinTumblremail

If you enjoyed this post, do me a favour and share!Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter
Share on Facebook
Facebook
Share on Google+
Google+
Share on LinkedIn
Linkedin
Share on Tumblr
Tumblr
Email this to someone
email
View Post

Mike Duffy and the $90,000 Cheque – Part 3 (5mins)

In Case Comments, Case Comments, Criminal Law, Mental Elements by Peter Sankoff4 Comments

My examination of the charges against Mike Duffy relating to the infamous $90000 cheque provided by Nigel Wright continues. In today’s video blog, which is Part 3 of an ongoing examination, I focus upon the final charge: bribery, and the challenges the Crown is likely to have in proving that count of the indictment.  In addition, I address another “lurking” question: …

If you enjoyed this post, do me a favour and share!Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter
Share on Facebook
Facebook
Share on Google+
Google+
Share on LinkedIn
Linkedin
Share on Tumblr
Tumblr
Email this to someone
email
View Post

Mike Duffy and the $90,000 Cheque – Part 2 (5mins)

In Case Comments, Case Comments, Criminal Law, Physical Elements by Peter Sankoff1 Comment

My examination of the charges against Mike Duffy relating to the infamous $90000 cheque provided by Nigel Wright continues. In today’s video blog, which is Part 2 of an ongoing examination, I focus upon the charge of Breach of Trust, and the challenges the Crown is likely to have in proving that count of the indictment. If you enjoyed this post, …

If you enjoyed this post, do me a favour and share!Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter
Share on Facebook
Facebook
Share on Google+
Google+
Share on LinkedIn
Linkedin
Share on Tumblr
Tumblr
Email this to someone
email
View Post

Mike Duffy and the $90,000 Cheque – Part 1 (5mins)

In Case Comments, Case Comments, Criminal Law, Physical Elements by Peter Sankoff2 Comments

In today’s video blog, which I envisage as being Part 1 of 4, I’m taking a look at the charges against Mike Duffy relating to the infamous $90000 cheque provided by Nigel Wright.  This blog focuses on issues likely to arise when the Crown attempts to prove one of the three charges brought in relation to that cheque, specifically: s. …

If you enjoyed this post, do me a favour and share!Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter
Share on Facebook
Facebook
Share on Google+
Google+
Share on LinkedIn
Linkedin
Share on Tumblr
Tumblr
Email this to someone
email