A New Dialogue: Overview and Reviews

Animal Law in Australasia looks at the legal relationship between humans and animals in Australia and New Zealand. It asks whether existing laws really do protect animals, and, where the law comes up short, how it could be improved. Australian, New Zealand and international experts cover topics ranging from core concepts and theoretical questions around “animal welfare” and law, to specific matters of concern: animal cruelty sentencing, live animal export, recreational hunting, and commercial uses of animals in farming and research. The questions explored go beyond animal welfare and challenge the reader to think about the nature of legal interests, and practical and ethical contexts for a range of laws.

Reviews of Animal Law in Australasia

Michael Allen Fox, Professor Emeritus, Queens University, Alternative Law Journal, Vol. 36, April 2011:

The articles in this collection are uniformly intelligent, penetrating and written in a seemingly uniform style…[The book] is engaged throughout with philosophical problems that we grapple with every day and address through the law, and with demonstrating how, at the level of practice getting it wrong philosophically ultimately leads to widespread animal suffering…  Those who want to get up to speed in this very interesting frontier area of law can do no better than start with [this] excellent volume.

The Hon. Michael Kirby, Judge of the High Court of Australia, 1996-2009 (reported in the Sydney Morning Herald, 6 August, 2010):

A year ago I launched a book that changed my life. It was Animal Law in Australasia. After reading it, I immediately ceased eating meat.

For more than a year, I have eaten neither flesh nor fowl… The book contained too much information. I could no longer pretend I did not know how sentient animals were slaughtered…  I was distressed at my earlier indifference and indirect participation in a huge industry of corporatised killing of sentient creatures…

A growing body of university students, most in law faculties, are electing to undertake courses in animal welfare law. Already, such courses are offered in six Australian law schools. More are on the horizon. What not so long ago was regarded as an exotic topic of limited interest is now a fast-growing curriculum subject with a real legal dimension.

Laura Donellan, University of Limerick, Ireland in the Journal of Animal Ethics (2011), Vol. 1 at 98:

Animal Law in Australasia is a well-researched and comprehensive text on core issues relating to the legal regulation of animals in Australia and New Zealand.  The book is well-written and presented.  The themes are presented in a coherent manner.  Not only is it of benefit to scholars and students interested in animal law in both countries, but it also offers an absorbing recount for readers in other jurisdictions.

This book is to be applauded given that law books of this nature are not often considered worthy of publication because of the esoteric nature of the subject…

Hopefully it will encourage similar texts from other countries so that scholarship on the legal protection of animals will gain gravitas and eventual acceptance as a mainstream field of law.

Susan Briggs, Release Magazine, September 2009:

This book is a must for anyone who is interested in animal rights and animal welfare…  Animal Law in Australasia is a book that leaves the reader with a compelling view for the laws to radically change…

Sue Kedgley, Green Party MP (New Zealand), February 2009:

Sue Kedgley, speaking at the Auckland Book Launch, March 2009

It is such an important book, not just for academics, but for the whole animal welfare movement in New Zealand…  It is incredibly absorbing and thought-provoking andprovides an extraordinary insight into the whole paradox of animal welfare legislation by exposing the inconsistencies, the flaws and the hypocrisies of our animal welfare law, and showing how human interests are always preferred over the needs of animals.

Claudette Vaughan, Abolitionist Online, 2009 (full review)

Animal Law In Australasia – A New Dialogue is a scholarly examination of existing legal relationships between humans and animals.  It is an indispensable guide into a vast inaccessible reality that exists for animals, which has yet to be challenged by society as a whole.

It is destined to become a standard in the literature of Australian and New Zealand animal law.   Here is a book that poses vital questions serving to underline how inadequate is the data on which to base answers to legal problems concerning animals and how inadequate is the current data concerning animals and their protection in law.

David Glasgow, Deakin Law Review, Volume 14, 2009

For the sake of the hundreds of millions of animals that suffer incalculably in Australia and New Zealand each year, hopefully this book will serve as a catalyst for positive change. The book is a heavy and often dispiriting read, but its underlying message is an optimistic one. By drawing upon the best principles of justice and compassion that underlie liberal democracy, Animal Law in Australasia shines a beacon of light for our legislators and judges to follow if they are brave enough to withstand the sheer power of the opposing force.

Vernon Tava, Auckland University Law Review, September 2009

Animal Law in Australasia is a comprehensive effort with 17 chapters by 15 contributors. Despite the number of authors there is a consistency of style throughout that is testimony to the efforts of the editors. It is refreshing, then, to see a book such as this – scholarly in approach but accessible in style – refining the quality of discourse and framing, as the subtitle proposes, a new dialogue.

Aaron Lloyd, Minter Ellison Rudd Watts, New Zealand Lawyer, June 2010

The book is compelling reading for anyone with a strong interest in animal welfare, but is also a commendable read for students of jurisprudence, and those interested in a broader understanding of the concept of the law and the way in which legal regulation can promote social good.

Animal Law in Australasia was also cited several times by Chief Justice Fraser of the Alberta Court of Appeal in her dissenting opinion in Reece v. Edmonton (City)(2011).